Experts on Monroe's life, however, said it's highly unlikely that the smiling young blonde in the film is her.

然而，梦露生平的研究专家们说，影片中那个微笑的年轻金发女郎极不可能为梦露本人。

Comparing the film with known Monroe images leaves ample room for doubt. And several documents Barsa said proved his argument — a letter from the American Film Institute and what looks like a declassified FBI file that mentions a 1965 attempt to sell an alleged Marilyn Monroe sex film — are inconclusive.

将这部影片与为世人所熟知的梦露形象相对比，也留下许多疑问。而巴萨提到的可以证明他观点的若干份文件不够有说服力，包括一封美国电影学院的信，以及一份疑似联邦调查局的解密文件，其中提到1965年有人出售据称是梦露拍摄的性爱短片。

Monroe's image and estate is protected by the brand development and licensing company Authentic Brands Group. Its spokeswoman, Carlson, said a sale of the film would invite legal action for "perpetrating a fraud on the public, violating the Monroe estate's exclusive rights to her image and other claims of intellectual property infringement."

梦露的形象和遗产一直受品牌发展及许可公司“正宗品牌公司”保护。该公司女发言人卡尔逊说，如果有人出售该影片，他们将起诉，控告其“欺诈大众，侵犯梦露遗产公司的形象专属权及其它知识产权。”

"To me personally, it doesn't even resemble her," Carlson said.

卡尔逊说：“我个人觉得，根本连像都不像。”