字母哥和浓眉哥都是新生代最具潜力的球员,他们被认为是未来的NBA门面,年纪轻轻就跻身联盟前列,无论个人表现还是天赋潜力,都足够出色。但若有机会二选一(虽然这个机会得被雷劈好几百次才能得到)的话,我们该选谁呢。刚刚bleacherreport网站就字母与浓眉谁更强来了一波分析,吃瓜群众一起来围观吧!
Everyone with sense would start with the numbers. Antetokounmpo is 23, nearly two full years younger than Davis, who's 25.That wouldn't settle things. You'd dig deeper, finding that when considering the expectations and demands of their positions.
每个理性的人都会从数据开始。字母哥现在23岁,比戴维斯年轻近两岁,然而光考虑年龄不会解决问题。你应该深入挖掘,通盘考虑他们各自位置上的预期和需求才能有所收获。
The numbers are an imperfect way to do this. Both players are phenomenally productive in their current forms, which is why they finished right near the top in last year's MVP voting. Davis was third; Antetokounmpo was sixth.
这些数字是一种不完美的方式。这两位球员在目前的状态下都表现出了非常高的成绩,这就是为什么他们在去年的MVP投票中接近顶峰的原因。戴维斯排名第三;字母哥排名第六。
And you're not going to get much separation turning to team success, too. While Davis got two playoff trips (and one series win) and Antetokounmpo got three postseason visits (without a series victory).
而且你也不会因为团队的成功而获得太多的分离。虽然戴维斯有两次季后赛之旅(以及一次系列赛胜利),而字母哥有三次季后赛访问(没有系列赛胜利)。
These two appear equally great, with some room for differentiation depending on what you value most. So maybe shifting the angle of attack will provide clarification. Instead of acknowledging what both have done, you need to see if there are things one can do for your franchise that the other can't.
这两个看起来同样很棒,根据你最重视的东西,有一些区分空间。因此,改变攻角可能会提供澄清。而不是承认两者都做了什么,你需要看看是否有可以为你的特许经营做的事情,而另一方则不能。
Davis is the best version of something we understand: a modern NBA center. Capable of defending the rim, owning the glass, surviving on switches and scoring from all three levels, there's not a more complete big man in the NBA. He's developed some guard skills over the years and shot 34 percent from deep last season. AD is at the absolute apex for the center position, even though he's played 51 percent of his career minutes at the 4.
戴维斯是我们理解的最好的版本:一个现代化的NBA中锋。能够防守篮筐,拥有篮板,能防守且能通过这三种方式转换得分,NBA中没有一个比他更完整的大个子。多年来,他培养了一些后卫技术,并且上赛季他从远距离投篮命中率达到34%。AD处于中锋位置的绝对顶点,尽管他4年的职业生涯上场时间占51%。
Antetokounmpo is different. Uncharted territory. An anomaly. This novelty, coupled with a growth trajectory with no clear end in sight, opens up vast realms of possibility. It also creates a distinction between the two stars. In fact, it may be the critical difference.
字母哥与众不同。未知领域。一种异常。这种新颖性,伴随着一种没有明显目的的增长轨迹,开辟了广阔的可能性领域。它还创造了两个巨星之间的区别。事实上,它可能是关键的区别。
Davis, great as he is in his role, and impressive as he's been in expanding his game, will never be able to do the variety of things on a basketball court that seemingly come easily to Antetokounmpo. The converse assertion, that Antetokounmpo could do everything Davis does, may be dispositive.
戴维斯,在他的角色中表现得非常出色,并且在他扩大比赛的过程中给人留下深刻印象,他们永远无法在篮球场上做各种各样的事情,这些球场似乎很容易传到字母哥。相反的断言,字母哥可以完成戴维斯所做的一切,可能是决定性的。
This feeds into the idea that Antetokounmpo is the greater unknown. That there remain untapped reservoirs of talent within him. That what we're seeing from him now is nothing like what we'll see from him in a year. Or two years. Or five.
这反映了字母哥是更大的未知数的想法。他内部仍然还有未开发的潜能。我们现在从他身上看到的就像我们一年中从他身上看到的一样。或两年。或者五年。
Antetokounmpo can become Davis, but Davis cannot become Antetokounmpo.
字母哥可以成为戴维斯,但戴维斯不能成为字母哥。
Also, it's a small point but one worth considering in a contest this tight: The NBA is a wing's league. And Antetokounmpo—even if we're largely basing our analysis on the notion that he'll be much more than a wing—is one. Davis just isn't.
此外,这是一个小点,但在一场比赛中值得考虑的是:NBA是一个侧翼联盟。而字母哥——即使我们在很大程度上依据的观点也是基于他不仅仅是一个翼的概念。戴维斯不是。
In the end, we've seen players like Davis before. Maybe they haven't been as good, but we're at least familiar with the concept. Antetokounmpo is already something different, and if we're to assume (which we should) his exceptional skill expansion and growth trajectory remain unfinished, he could redefine what we expect from a star.
最后,我们之前见过像戴维斯这样的球员。也许他们没有那么好,但我们至少熟悉这个概念。字母哥已经有了不同之处,如果我们假设他的特殊技能扩张和成长轨迹仍未完成,他可以重新定义我们对明星的期望。
Giannis Antetokounmpo is the cornerstone.
字母哥是基石。
更多精彩内容请关注微信公众号、新浪微博:篮球英文堂