评论
打印
So Scott Anderson is our first Law Philosophy fellow and he is a PHD from our own Philosophy department
斯科特.安德森是首位加入我们法律哲学项目 的专家 他也是我们学校哲学系 的博士生
who while he was er a graduate student took a lot of law courses
在他攻读哲学专业期间 他就已经学习了很多法律课程
and wrote a dissertation on coercion in which he discussed er legal issues
还写了篇关于强迫的论文 在论文中 他既探讨了法律问题
as well as philosophical issues, so he was a natural choice for that inaugural er fellowship and
也探讨了哲学问题 因此他自然成为了我们研究项目的开班学员
er so he's done everything for this conference,
这次大会都是他辛辛苦苦组织起来的
I've done nothing at all,
相比之下 我什么都没做
and it really is his invention to try to take the philosophical
将这次研讨会的主题定为 哲学和法律也是他的想法
and legal themes of the workshop in the direction of these issues of great contemporary importance.
在当代社会 这些问题都 具有重要的意义
The other er important decision that Scott made
斯科特的另一个重要决定
and that we all support is making it an interdisciplinary conference.
我们也都表示支持 那就是把大会办为跨学科交流的平台
Our Law school is lucky that we are on the same campus
我们学校的法学院很幸运
and the same calendar with other units in the university and there's no other place where interdisciplinary cooperation flourishes the way it does here.
因为我们和学校的其他专业和学院 在同一个校区 在同一个时区 因此我们的跨学科合作在这里 得到了最大限度的繁荣和发展
You can see that in the student papers themselves which came from so many different um, different units.
这点大家可以从学生论文中看出来 这些学生来自不同专业和方向
